任何地理或口音变化的手语,在口头听写和听觉的流行下面临着持续的审查，这是可以理解的。通过这个,，对于那些依赖这种手语进行基本对话的人来说，目前缺乏无障碍的沟通，因此出现了许多潜在的问题。此类人工智能系统通常采用识别和解释模型, 的形式，旨在提供无缝且准确的翻译。事实上，这些系统是根据有偏见的数据构建的，并且在没有聋人社区任何输入的情况下创建。这些模型被听力同行广泛使用和接受，他们对手势语言系统中存在的固有文化,语义和口语语言仍然一无所知。这种现象在 Ellul 的《技术系统》和《技术虚张声势》的范围内得到了最好的分析。事实上,这里起作用的是技术人员将语言标准化为可以通过技术:数据,统计,数学语言捕获的内容。为了使人工智能技术存在,，手语必须合理化,，以追求利润，从而消除了沟通的条件，并且无法捕捉聋人的人类经验。通过该过程,，它呈现了规范效果,，创建了一个Man,标准化,大众化,的模型，并且必须适应工具和技术环境，而不是相反,，我们认为这应该是此类技术的目标。因此，技术重塑了人类的意义,，让聋人能够实现生产力和效率的目标。这样做,它表现出明显的反生产力,疏远而不是解放,孤立而不是滋养人际关系。因此，本文主张人工智能作为 Ableist Intelligence, 的想法，因为此类系统试图强调符号的羞辱和边缘化本质。
Sign languages, of any geographical or accentual variation, understandably face continuous scrutiny under the ever present popularity of verbal dictation and audism. Through this, many potential problems arise with the current lack of accessible communication for those who rely on such sign languages for essential conversation. Such AI systems regularly take the form of recognition and interpretation models, designed to provide seamless and accurate translation. In reality these systems are built from biased data and created without any input from deaf communities. Such models are widely used and accepted by their hearing counterparts who remain ignorant to the inherent culture, semantics and colloquial language present in gestural language systems. This phenomenon is best analysed under the scope of The Technological System and Technological bluff by Ellul. Indeed, what is at play here is the standardization of language by technicians into what can be captured by technique: data, statistics, a mathematical language. For that AI technique to exist, sign language must be rationalized, in a search for profit that annihilates the conditions for communication and fails to capture the human experience of the deaf person. By that process, it presents normative effects, creating a model of Man, standardized, massified, and who has to adapt to the tool and technical milieu instead of the other way around, which we assume should have been the goal of such a technology. Technique thus reshapes what it means to be human, to submit deaf people to the goals of productivity and efficiency. In doing so, it exhibits clear counter productivity, alienating instead of emancipating, isolating instead of nourishing human relationships. Therefore this paper argues for the idea of AI as Ableist Intelligence, as such systems seek to emphasise the humiliated and marginalised nature of sign.
科目: 人工智能 (cs.AI); 计算机与社会 (cs.CY); 人机交互 (cs.HC)
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)